Reliablilty of Megasquirt long term

Discussion pertaining to positive pressure E28s.
Post Reply
Coldswede
Posts: 6859
Joined: Oct 10, 2008
Location: Back U.P. North,. Where the water's blue, the wind is free and seasons four.

Reliablilty of Megasquirt long term

Post by Coldswede »

I was wondering abut the long tern, down the highway, everyday usage reliability of a properly built and correctly set-up MS system? It would be a major problem if the unit were to die 500 miles from home. Anyone have input?
turbodan
Posts: 9694
Joined: Jan 09, 2007

Post by turbodan »

I commute in my turbo car. Every day. MS has worked consistently for me for the last two years. You dont have to worry about it.
Brad D.
Posts: 10735
Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by Brad D. »

Same here. I daily drive the turbo car and have had no issues for well over a year of driving.
Good & Tight
Posts: 461
Joined: Oct 29, 2007

Post by Good & Tight »

I have never had one fail on me in 5 years.
Brad D.
Posts: 10735
Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by Brad D. »

I think that part of the reliability is due to how well you build the unit and wire it into the car. If you do shoddy wiring or have poor solder joints on the PCB, then you are going to have problems.
Coldswede
Posts: 6859
Joined: Oct 10, 2008
Location: Back U.P. North,. Where the water's blue, the wind is free and seasons four.

Post by Coldswede »

I agree Brad, that's why I stipulated what your saying in the question. I'm wanting to buy a kit, I guess I'm half trying to talk myself out of it :laugh:

Thanks for the input guys
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

Brad's correct, the only non-reliable parts are the things you have to do during the installation. Those solder-joints are your reliability. I learned how to properly solder a week ago, meaning i'm absolutely no good at it. The best way to learn is just dive into a project in my opinion.
M. Holtmeier
Posts: 3053
Joined: Mar 11, 2007
Location: Josephine, Texas

Post by M. Holtmeier »

Coldswede wrote: I'm wanting to buy a kit, I guess I'm half trying to talk myself out of it :laugh:
If you are a tinker'er in any way, building a MS is very satisfying. I've been running mine for a year now, problem free, and just keep adding on to it, i.e.; boost, fan, w/i, idle, shift lights.
Martin in BellevueWA
Posts: 593
Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Bellevue,WA

Post by Martin in BellevueWA »

Maybe the question to be asked is the following. Is anyone completely happy with their megasquirt tune?
A search on this topic is revealing. Anticipate that posts aren't made for something that doesn't need attention, like a well-tuned setup. There are a bunch of posts that represent marginal tunes and continual attention. With that in mind, that Megasquirt demands attention and tuning ability, there are no similar cost alternatives that do as well managing a newly-turbo'd car. I spent $1,700 on a chip, bosch maf, 36lb injectors, and a couple hours tuning with Miller. I am also only 2 hours away from Miller. Border guards don't want US cars left in Canada without the owner.
George
Posts: 2889
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by George »

Am I 100% happy with my tune?

No

Am I satisfied with my tune?

Yes

I'm constantly making changes to my set-up. I've switched injectors, gone from a 3.0bar fpr to a 3.5 bar fpr. Switched boost levels. Added Water/Meth injection. Altered the W/A intercooler....

For all the changes I've made and for all the changes I plan to make in the future, I don't see there being any alternative to using megasquirt. There simply aren't the resources like the Mx/Sx guys have to call up a tuner, tell them your changes and have them remote burn a chip for you.

If feel like half the battle with megasquirt is learning the ins/outs of the system in the first place. Once you get over that initial hill the rest of the road is much smoother.
turbodan
Posts: 9694
Joined: Jan 09, 2007

Post by turbodan »

I'm absolutely happy with my tune. The car drives great. Better than stock. All the tweaking I do anymore is for fuel efficiency. I want to car to drive that well while using as little fuel as possible.
Brad D.
Posts: 10735
Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by Brad D. »

I am satisfied with my tune. It idles better than stock, drives better than stock it makes great power reliably and gets good fuel economy. I haven't driven around with the laptop in the car for many months as I have felt no need to tweak anything. Are there things I could possibly improve - absolutely, however there are plenty of things that could be improved with my old stock ecu and a chip both of which were/are totally livable.
FirstFives Dictator
Posts: 849
Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by FirstFives Dictator »

Martin in BellevueWA wrote:Maybe the question to be asked is the following. Is anyone completely happy with their megasquirt tune?
I'm not; even though it runs the best it's ever run and better than any Motronic 1.1 or 1.0 car I've driven, I still know there's more potential there, but I'm at a good point now.

For a reality check, I drive my finance's 2001 525i and these days I don't feel as far off as I did when I first started tuning MS.

It's been very reliable. Even starts cold if I roll and pop the clutch.
wkohler
Posts: 50939
Joined: Oct 05, 2006
Location: Phönix, Arizona, USA
Contact:

Post by wkohler »

I'd bet those $300 Acer laptops would be perfect for this, huh?
FirstFives Dictator
Posts: 849
Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by FirstFives Dictator »

wkohler wrote:I'd bet those $300 Acer laptops would be perfect for this, huh?
Probably. I hate my Dell D600 for serial comms.
Post Reply