It'll need better brakes. Actually, installing a straight six may be a little difficult without extensive modifications, the engine compartment of a model T is pretty short. I assume you've seen the Model A with a Cosworth BDA engine that was built so it looks stock to a casual observer some years ago: https://www.thedrive.com/news/37877/thi ... rth-engine
gadget73 wrote: Apr 15, 2025 3:50 PM
I'm enough of a purist to have issues with cross-brand engine swaps. That needs a turbo 2.3 out of a Turbocoupe.
In general I tend to agree with you but #1 it seems like half the antique cars just have SBC's in them and from all I remember that 2300 engine was just a turd, even with a blower on it. To me this would be so unusual and interesting I'd make an exception.
The fact that so many have an SBC is why I've become something of a purist. People assume I'm anti-GM. I'm not, I've had a Chevy in my life for a long time, I'm just bored to death with seeing 350's and now LS-family engines jammed into everything.
The turbo 2.3 wasn't awesome but a lot of that was the slow turbo. Once it started spinning it did fine but they majorly suck off the line. A better turbo, or even a ball bearing upgrade in that old T3 would make one a lot snappier. The EFI setup they used also wasn't totally awesome. Toilet flapper air vane meter. A real mass air sensor would remove that restriction. Ford had real mass air sensors back then, I don't know why the turbo engines got the flap. I think the very last ones had a real MAF and an intercooler. As usual about the time they fix the problems they stop making it. About the only other Ford turbo engine option is an Ecoboost.