http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/08/autos/f ... index.html

...or how many are still on the road.davintosh wrote:Germans like their foreign sports cars. It probably helps that you can hardly swing a dead cat without hitting a Ford dealership here.
Interesting that the article compares Muttstang sales to Porsche 911 sales. Let's compare value retained after 10 to 15 years.
... but excellent platforms for LS swaps.m-racer wrote:911's 10-15 years ago were 996's, the first of the water cooled...not exactly holding their values, and not setting any records for reliability.
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.Tammer in Philly wrote:... but excellent platforms for LS swaps.m-racer wrote:911's 10-15 years ago were 996's, the first of the water cooled...not exactly holding their values, and not setting any records for reliability.
http://www.renegadehybrids.com/911/LS-1.htmlAzure wrote:I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.Tammer in Philly wrote:... but excellent platforms for LS swaps.m-racer wrote:911's 10-15 years ago were 996's, the first of the water cooled...not exactly holding their values, and not setting any records for reliability.
I am now stationed in LA. Lower Alabama!Mike W. wrote:Duke's in Alabama? I thought he was in prison in Leavenworth Ks or something. At least Kansas would seem like prison to me.
So have I and never would consider owning one. Take a sixth generation GT for a test drive. Its a different animal even in stock form. I have since lowered mine and tightened up the IRS.dcains wrote:I've rented Mustangs on vacation trips, but the thrill is always gone before the trip is over.
This thing went around corners better than a super-heavy, monstrously-powered, stick-axle car should.demetk wrote:I had brand new 85 mustang once. It was a piece of cow dung. I doubt if that has changed except maybe that you can now go much faster in a straight line than in 85. In 85, my mustang couldn't even do a straight line well.
Your experience is over 30 years old and invalid. I drove a 2016 an hour ago. Come on back after you have test drove a 2016 GT with 435HP.demetk wrote:I had brand new 85 mustang once. It was a piece of cow dung. I doubt if that has changed except maybe that you can now go much faster in a straight line than in 85.
WAT, my experience is invalid?Duke wrote:Your experience is ... invalid.
"I doubt if that has changed " 85 compared to a 2016 is invalid.demetk wrote:Duke wrote:WAT, my experience is invalid?
OK, I'll have to admit that. I forget what I paid for my 85 but I think it was less than ten grand. What's the 2016 GT cost?Duke wrote:"I doubt if that has changed " 85 compared to a 2016 is invalid.demetk wrote:Duke wrote:WAT, my experience is invalid?
Mine is loaded with just about all boxes checked. I got a deal from a friend well under MSRP and it was ~$42K with TT&L.demetk wrote:What's the 2016 GT cost?

Thanks!demetk wrote:Do you have a pic posted somewhere?
Jesus! That's a mean looking mofo.Duke wrote:Thanks!demetk wrote:Do you have a pic posted somewhere?
http://www.mye28.com/viewtopic.php?f=2& ... 5&start=50

