
to here

It's slow doing everything twice, but worth it sometimes.

I'm not a big fan of it most of the time. On some cars it just looks wrong, IMO. Your car looks great with it now, it all now matches. before the chrome looked out of place. Very nice change.Mike W. wrote:Well last weekend, not today, but I continued the transfer of the good stuff from one E39 touring to another. I like shadowline, I really like it, and the old one had it and the new one didn't. Past tense. From here
to here
It's slow doing everything twice, but worth it sometimes.
and it's replacement would be...slammin_e28 wrote:I took the M52 out of the Range Rover Saturday.
.....better get to prepping it's replacement I guess.
Mike W. wrote:and it's replacement would be...slammin_e28 wrote:I took the M52 out of the Range Rover Saturday.
.....better get to prepping it's replacement I guess.
slammin_e28 wrote:Mike W. wrote:and it's replacement would be...slammin_e28 wrote:I took the M52 out of the Range Rover Saturday.
.....better get to prepping it's replacement I guess.
![]()
![]()
From all my research the 4hp22 (which the Rover uses) is the same case as the 4hp24 (which the M70 uses). The 22 wasn't used with the M70 because torques. So, I'll get a 24....and take the tail of the Rover 22 and bolt it on....then my Tcase will bolt onto the 24. The trans mount is part of the tail housing on the left, and part of the Tcase on the right....so no worries there. IIRC the bellhousing is 2" longer on the 24....but I have plenty of room in front of the engine (4+" with the M50). The steering box will be swapped to a Rover P38 box...it sits outside the frame rails as opposed to the RRC box that is inboard. Shock towers will be moved back over the spring instead of in front (RRC had air bag suspension, now it springs) with Discovery 1 shock towers and mounts. Drag link is just a rod, I can make a custom one to fit. I'll move the engine mount mounts on the frame so I can use the OE M70 engine mount arms and done. Exhaust will all be custom using the OE headers, probably splice it into the OE Rover exhaust since it has a Y from the V8. Engine management will be MS3x with M30 throttle bodies.Mike W. wrote:slammin_e28 wrote:Mike W. wrote:and it's replacement would be...slammin_e28 wrote:I took the M52 out of the Range Rover Saturday.
.....better get to prepping it's replacement I guess.
![]()
![]()
Hmmm, a 6 to a double 6. I guess there's a logic to it. Is the bellhousing the same making it relatively easy?
You almost make it sound easy. Almost, but not quite. But as long as you can bolt the engine to the transmission to the transfer case it doesn't sound too over the top. At least that's the part that would intimidate me. Was there a problem with the M52 in there or just a more is better thing?slammin_e28 wrote:From all my research the 4hp22 (which the Rover uses) is the same case as the 4hp24 (which the M70 uses). The 22 wasn't used with the M70 because torques. So, I'll get a 24....and take the tail of the Rover 22 and bolt it on....then my Tcase will bolt onto the 24. The trans mount is part of the tail housing on the left, and part of the Tcase on the right....so no worries there. IIRC the bellhousing is 2" longer on the 24....but I have plenty of room in front of the engine (4+" with the M50). The steering box will be swapped to a Rover P38 box...it sits outside the frame rails as opposed to the RRC box that is inboard. Shock towers will be moved back over the spring instead of in front (RRC had air bag suspension, now it springs) with Discovery 1 shock towers and mounts. Drag link is just a rod, I can make a custom one to fit. I'll move the engine mount mounts on the frame so I can use the OE M70 engine mount arms and done. Exhaust will all be custom using the OE headers, probably splice it into the OE Rover exhaust since it has a Y from the V8. Engine management will be MS3x with M30 throttle bodies.Mike W. wrote:slammin_e28 wrote:Mike W. wrote:and it's replacement would be...slammin_e28 wrote:I took the M52 out of the Range Rover Saturday.
.....better get to prepping it's replacement I guess.![]()
![]()
Hmmm, a 6 to a double 6. I guess there's a logic to it. Is the bellhousing the same making it relatively easy?
TL:DR it's not bolt in, but bolt in with swapping components.
Researching it I came across a guy named Kito....he did the same swap. It's pretty glorious. He's got a vid or two on Youtube.
M52 was a bit anemic. I sold it. It's going to be put in another RRC but with a 3.2 bottom end. I wanted to build the 3.2 deal, but I'd rather swap than build and engine. Plus too I've kind of been falling into the parts I need.Mike W. wrote:You almost make it sound easy. Almost, but not quite. But as long as you can bolt the engine to the transmission to the transfer case it doesn't sound too over the top. At least that's the part that would intimidate me. Was there a problem with the M52 in there or just a more is better thing?
I'm waiting until I actually get the engine in the truck, lol. Way too much on the plate now. Maybe I can bring it to V@V 2016....davintosh wrote:So, where's the build thread on that beast, Jeff? (if you don't have one yet, you need one.)
Chas, you spent too much time with the P car guys, polishing the inside of the wheel? And looks like a nice E39 you stole, I thought the new one I just got was low mileage at 83K, but yours?Karl Grau wrote:Replaced the cabin filters and cleaned some wheels that might go on it.
The placed that refinished them did it for an extra paltry amount so I couldn't say no.Mike W. wrote:Chas, you spent too much time with the P car guys, polishing the inside of the wheel?
Thanks, it was a long four days between putting the deposit down and picking it up. Some douchebag flipper/dealer showed up offering him more than the asking price but the seller wanted to go to an enthusiast (I drove the e28Mike W. wrote:And looks like a nice E39 you stole, I thought the new one I just got was low mileage at 83K, but yours?