Page 3 of 3

Posted: Mar 14, 2013 10:49 AM
by 1st 5er
shagrath wrote:
1st 5er wrote:
I would if the link worked.
Works fine for me.
Worked that time, :dunno: and I signed it. :cool: Being a Marine, I know the cost of serving.

Posted: Mar 14, 2013 11:32 AM
by WilNJ
Pointless exercise. If you want to effect change, spend that time reaching out to your elected officials, but if signing something that at most, will get a response in the form of a press release that will be mentioned in a 15 second sound bite on the news makes you happy, have at it.

Posted: Mar 14, 2013 11:36 AM
by Duke
WilNJ wrote:Pointless exercise. If you want to effect change, spend that time reaching out to your elected officials, but if signing something that at most, will get a response in the form of a press release that will be mentioned in a 15 second sound bite on the news makes you happy, have at it.
I am sure there has been a flood of Congressional Inquiry's from soldiers to their reps. Like I said earlier in this thread, this is a ploy by DOD to put pressure on congress.

Posted: Mar 14, 2013 12:07 PM
by m-racer
WilNJ wrote:
m-racer wrote:
WilNJ wrote:If it's cost plus without competition that's a whole other problem, if it's cost plus with competition, the market will resolve that issue.
In many cases, that is exactly what it is and given the cost, and other barriers to entry, in parts of the defense market, it will not correct itself.
But the same folks who hold the keys of entry are the same ones that would have to address what might be considered reasonable compensation, neither is going to happen.

I guess it is relevant, but still moot.
Nothing ever changes without challenge and that is doubtful. On that we agree, however your comment was that it was not relevant.

Posted: Mar 14, 2013 12:13 PM
by WilNJ
m-racer wrote:
WilNJ wrote:I guess it is relevant, but still moot.

...however your comment was that it was not relevant.
Right, that's why I acknowledged that in my post.

Posted: Mar 14, 2013 12:48 PM
by unt0uchable
Signed.

Thank you all for your dedicated service to our country.

Pointless

Posted: Mar 20, 2013 12:27 AM
by gidgaf
What makes you think "they" care?
You/ we are one of the 47%.
Even tho that's about half the people in the country, we don't count.
Lindsay or Britney or Justin will goof off in a bit, and we'll forget about this. Most of us will.
For some odd reason most folk think that less for YOU means more for ME. It just means more for THEM.
And since there's a lot of us, a little mordito goes a long way.

Yes, it's "us" vs "them".
I just did my taxes- I'd love to have just 14% taken off and I can keep the rest!
And why does that guy get $60k per day and "we" get protective about it, but don't dare let a cop or a teacher or a busdriver work overtime and get $60k a year.

Posted: Mar 28, 2013 5:15 PM
by Duke
DoD Restoring Tuition Assistance for All Services


http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013 ... 962&rank=3

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

43,742 signed the above petition.

Posted: Mar 28, 2013 6:35 PM
by Tammer in Philly
Duke wrote:DoD Restoring Tuition Assistance for All Services


http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013 ... 962&rank=3

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

43,742 signed the above petition.
Hey not bad, that's <3% of all active servicemen/women. And I'm sure active service were the only signers. I'll bet it was the petition that did it, rather than it being a bluff all along.

-tammer

Posted: Mar 28, 2013 7:04 PM
by wkohler
No one cares about the sequester anymore, so...

Posted: Mar 29, 2013 8:00 PM
by 1st 5er
... and a few of us civilians.

Posted: Mar 29, 2013 8:58 PM
by Tammer in Philly
1st 5er wrote:... and a few of us civilians.
There was some sarcasm there.

Posted: Mar 29, 2013 9:09 PM
by 1st 5er
Had me fooled.