Ok another update. My last weeks have mainly been research and thinking about the intercooler setup and next steps.
As i said earlier, I got super lucky with this block being an early B35 because it has the correct mounting bosses. 1987 casting
Mounting positions shown, with 533i/633 mounting arm and oil drain position (-12 AN) of oil pan.
Not so much progress on the car visually, but it included reinstalling the engine mount, oil pan, turbo, turbo manifold and ARP head studs. I did a valve adjustment and think I will use the B35 valve cover (the B34 one has a nice grounding stud on the valve cover for my m1.1 harness, but i can make do without).
Engine installed with motor mount but needing many things hooked back together and installed. May put the FPR back in the OEM location, but I brought it over from the last setup, being remote mounted for IC piping clearance.
Manifold, turbo, oil pan, starter, alternator and pulley back on. Visually positioned with airbox/turbo inlet. Scoping out what space there is for components with or without AC.... AC not totally critical to me.
I thought about what upgrades I might want to try now that I have the opportunity to keep AC or cut out different areas for a FMIC and different pipe routing. Overall, I was sort of thinking, what about the option for a water to air intercooler, wasted spark, or other mods? What would be the benefit or drawback? With this frame of mind, I thought LJ had a point that I could reimagine options, as I hadn't really considered waiter to air intercooling before due to complexity and weight.
As I researched it further, I saw a big appeal in reduced turbo lag-- some of this being because I am at 5000ft elevation and have lower response because of the ~18% less dense air. This gets exacerbated at higher elevations in the mountains as well. And one of the huge benefits of the W/A setup is that it can reduce inlet pressure drop and inlet intake tract volume on the M30. By my calculations, it should be reduced by 1/3 in volume to fill post turbo in the piping and 1-3psi less outlet pressure being forced upon the turbo.
Note that I measure boost pressure into the engine, not at the turbo outlet like some. This gives me a reading of true engine boost, but also means the turbo itself has previously had to work harder above that pressure to get flow through all the bends, piping and IC unit. So generally it means MORE HEAT coming out of the compressor to use an A/A vs the W/A. As I researched further, the W/A intercooler is generally more consistent in temperatures, say within 5F of ambient when cruising and steady state with normal cruise loads, and 15-20F above ambient at all times if the system is sized appropriately. An A/A I could get down to 10F quickly, but during a more boost, temperatures always creeped and had a larger variation after just a single run as things heated or cooled or speeds changed.
Additionally, in W2A you can select a different pump and hose size to flow more and achieve better cooling, or you can fit a slightly smaller core and heat exchanger and exceed cooling capacity of an A/A setup. Or you could do both! Specifically for low speeds and mountain runs, this sounded beneficial and interesting to try.
When i looked for a replacement intercooler of my last setup, price was about $200... but in new parts I can play with a few things and have some fun in setting up a unique system for not much more($750 all in?).
As I shared in the last post, a generic intercooler core can be used. I found one slightly bigger that I think will just barely fit, so I mocked it up with cardboard. You can see it has an L shaped path, but the shortest possible route to the intake--up and over the engine. The turbo outlet is vertical almost, and then with a single 90 degree bend and larger 3" coupler the flow can slow down a bit, hit a big core, spend a little time cooling off and then have a straight shot into the intake. Add idle air port and correct BOV after and all will actually barely fit! Here is the cardboard mock up:
Top mounted above the valve cover is warm, but not as close to the exhaust manifold as what TCD uses, so maybe it will absorb similar or less heat. From my research, this IC core is about 20% bigger than the TCD intercooler (which itself previously cost $650 through Todd)).
It might just barely fit under the hood!
So i measured the AC condenser and see this as the prime spot for a W2A heat exchanger. I am looking at the biggest I can fit in this space, 22"x16"x2". Apparently this is usually the limiting item in a W2A setup. But the placement I am looking at will allow the use of the stock oil cooler as well, which means oil cooling capacity I didn't have before, without heating up the radiator. And for most daily use, the heat exchanger will be circulating water less than 100F, so it will actually not affect engine coolant cooling capacity. But when the oil does heat up there will be an extra capacity/volume from the oil cooler loop (over 7quarts), and the cooled oil will feed directly to the turbo identically to the old setup.
It will be a tight fit to plumb the water lines, but from what I see, flexible lines and pump placement will be possible. The biggest worry is the inlet to the heat exchanger just because there isn't a lot of room to snake a 3/4" (1.1" Outer diameter) hose past the headlights and into the nose.. but I will find a way.
One bonus to this is that I probably wouldn't need an e-fan. When at low speeds and idling, the Mechanical fan will pull some air across the core and cool a bit in traffic....
The outlet should go directly to the main pump which is an important component. I was originally looking at the Bosch 010 or a modified version which seemed sufficient until I stumbled on this chart. Not that there is a cooler resistance system line, so you can tell approximately where the pump may run based on a circulating system, all dependent on head (system losses/pressure).
The system isn't my system, but it might be close and you can definitely see the general trend and impact of increased system pressure as you upsize the pump.
I settled on a used Pierburg CWA50 which was affordable used and has a good reputation for reliability (used in german OEM's). I bought one used for less than $100.
In this example, 27.5l/min (7.25gpm) vs the BOSCH 010 of 22l/min(5.8gpm) was the difference (about 20% increase, maybe moreso if my system pressure is lower). If my system pressure is lower (it should be because of no elbow fittings and single pass heat exchanger, decent IC with low restriction), I get more flow and better cooling. The big benefit being that this pump can be PWM speed controlled, which I am thinking of trying and uses a low 6A current even at max draw. I can also shut off the pump and still have cooling affect, or run at a low amperage to not overstress the electrical system. This was the main reason I avoided the CWA100 (~8.5GPM) which could run at 10+A, and the price of it was no cheaper than $260 that I could find. Most of these beefier pumps are $200 or more. Physically they are identical, so I could upsize in the future if I really decided it might help.

After removing the AC, the pump will live down low in the system close to where the AC compressor usually would be mounted. But it will be on the frame of the car, not hanging off the engine! So the wat will loop a route behind the fog light and into the pump and then shoot up vertically right into the intercooler with the coolest water temps possible 2 feet up and then through the core along the length of the engine toward the passenger and oil fill cap.
As I mapped it out, I wanted to get a water reservoir. I stumped upon this E36 expansion tank and liked it because of a split vertical divider. So flow can go in vertically, air can settle out as it flows up and over the divider and then drops back down while being sucked out the other opening in a closed loop system. The inlet and outlet ports looked close to the 3/4"/19mm I was hoping for, and the price was low enough as well at ~$30.
The system I think usually gets coolant overflow through the top port from the radiator and this side of the divider in E36's establishes the height for the level sensor. I will use it differently but think it will work for what I need. This will catch the air bubbles and allow splashing around all while still being the collection for air bubbles. I think the system will have to be mostly filled to the brim, just above the the height of the divider for the system to work properly and collect air from elsewhere in the loop. It also has a bleeder screw and a small access bleed hose if i really need to top up the system somehow.
More details and photos here, but I saved their images:
https://www.mishimoto.eu/media/magefan_ ... rnal-3.jpg
It has 3 open areas, and the port normally for the level sender has a small split and tube above it. This will definitely do what I need to allow air to collect because of the passageways and internal path for air to escape via the tube. I think water in the main opening will fill that side, and then any air bubbles can collect in the other 2 chambers, but there is a larger volume and lower opening for draining of the fluid back into the bottom return.
The outlet will use gravity and pull from the lowest point (typically the sender side), minimizing air bubbles (i hope).
The tube and cap inside is interesting and maybe would also be a small air pocket if totally filled to the brim before priming the system.
https://drive4corners.com/wp-content/us ... nal-6.webp
https://drive4corners.com/wp-content/us ... al-14.webp
Capacity would have been nice to be bigger, but the important part was the width (~3") which seemed like it could fit near my brake master and hydroboost bomb, along with the 2 large ports. It is also designed for coolant and will definitely hold ~4-5psi of the water loop. But the placement will be on the cold side of the engine and the plastic tank will mean the water can remain insulated from engine bay temperatures better than an aluminum tank. I can maybe run the bleed line directly to the heat exchanger because it is open to the tank insides and not just the vent cap. Inlet and outlet will be vertical (hopefully to burp all bubbles).
This solution was actually kind of exciting to find!
I ordered one and also the intercooler.
It arrived and I placed the IC on the engine. I think with some adhesive/rubber on the valve cover and then a mounting bracket or 2 to the B35 valve cover, it should work! It is a tight squeeze to the hood, as expected - I hope it all fits!!! Eventually maybe some insulating heat reflective foil of some kind.
Tank location and approximate intercooler position, I can find a way to mount both securely. Should also fit with the strut bar installed.:
Lastly, I am contemplating a PWM controller to run the pump with a variable control from the cabin. Also as an on/off switch. I am not sure that it really needs to be shut off or programmed and controlled by the MS2 but I was also thinking about this, on above 165F coolant temps OR MAT above 80 F. Maybe try it with both, because a manual control of the pump for filling and bleeding after maintenance would be handy, especially if the laptop wasn't in the car and I wanted to shut the pump off because the system developed a small leak while being out and about...
With all of this, I am also contemplating wasted spark as I alluded to in a previous post. I have the coils now and I think I can program them and solder the chips TC4427 onto my board for 3 spark outputs. I just need some small wiring and soldering changes. I have room on the proto area and would test it with jimstim. I think this would give a better idle and slightly more reliable spark.
Just for reference for my self with my spare Ms2 unit, here are the TC4427 units and the associated wiring on an incomplete ms2 v3.0 board.
I would mount the coils down near the ABS module (under my airbox) with a custom bracket solution I build and then would need to simply wire up the outputs and power to the 6 coils. I think the stock spark plug wires would reach, and all would be somewhat hidden under the airbox.
Basically mounted back to back but I need to figure this out further. I'd just need a cam/distributor cover plate.
Maybe a last photo for motivation, but this should be close to how the car will end up looking, some image i found on the web, I don't know if it is RoyalBlue or some other color:
Oh and an AI generated image, definitely has some limitations, but I thought it looked decent!
I have lots of work to do still, but little by little I will keep moving on it! Next up, likely clutch and maybe transmission and ordering of more parts!