Talk about BMW E28s and the people who own them. Use Tech Talk for tech questions and topics.
Tammer in Philly
Posts: 10719 Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: CHI, IL
Post
by Tammer in Philly » Nov 07, 2008 10:09 AM
Duke wrote:
Well there you go, from your link -
A motion, in parliamentary procedure, is a formal proposal by a member of a deliberative assembly that the assembly take certain action.
Like I said earlier, others are morons in this thread, not I.
I motion that we are now finished with this foolishness.
From the same link, the person making the motion is the mover, and he says "I move that ..."
-tammer
L_N_Love
Posts: 4106 Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Location: Richmond VA
Post
by L_N_Love » Nov 07, 2008 10:11 AM
Hunter has a Bimmer3 wrote: Well no one has said it so... BMWs wouldn't last five minutes in combat.
Or: "you wouldn't last 5 minutes in English class or reading comprehension."
shagrath
Posts: 14980 Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Location: pLace
Post
by shagrath » Nov 07, 2008 1:01 PM
Duke, I must say, the way you are using "motion" is not verbed correctly with the definitions even you provide.
It sounds sophisticated though!
*By the way, before you attack me, "verbed" is a word: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/verbed Verb: verbed:
Simple past tense and past participle of verb.
A way to fix your statements would be to say "I would like to make the motion that we.... blah blah." Make is the verb and motion is the noun. "Motion" as a verb is a physical act.
shagrath
Posts: 14980 Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Location: pLace
Post
by shagrath » Nov 07, 2008 1:08 PM
Tammer in Philly wrote: Duke wrote:
A motion , in parliamentary procedure, is a formal proposal by a member of a deliberative assembly that the assembly take certain action.
-tammer
This indicates that a
motion is a noun.
wkohler
Posts: 50941 Joined: Oct 05, 2006
Location: Phönix, Arizona, USA
Contact:
Post
by wkohler » Nov 07, 2008 1:35 PM
Motion = noun
Move = verb
I know that's already been said, but in my several experiences with parliamentary procedure, you would be immediately corrected.
Duke, just accept the fact that you were incorrect and take it as a learning experience. You're fighting a losing battle if you think you can convince those who are well-versed in grammar that the proper statement is, "I motion to..."
shagrath
Posts: 14980 Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Location: pLace
Post
by shagrath » Nov 07, 2008 1:52 PM
wkohler wrote: Motion = noun
Move = verb
I know that's already been said, but in my several experiences with parliamentary procedure, you would be immediately corrected.
Duke, just accept the fact that you were incorrect and take it as a learning experience. You're fighting a losing battle if you think you can convince those who are well-versed in grammar that the proper statement is, "I motion to..."
+1 It's no big thing, Duke! Sorry man, I can't help it. My mom was an English major and I had to investigate this.
It sounded good though!
Duke
Posts: 9986 Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Post
by Duke » Nov 07, 2008 2:41 PM
Duke wrote: I motion that we are now finished with this foolishness.
I second that motion!
To a vote then.
shagrath
Posts: 14980 Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Location: pLace
Post
by shagrath » Nov 07, 2008 2:46 PM
Duke wrote: I vote to make a motion that we are now finished with this foolishness.
Fixed.
Jeremy
Beamter
Posts: 15846 Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Connecticut
Post
by Jeremy » Nov 07, 2008 3:13 PM
Or you could've said . . .
Duke wrote: Duke wrote: I move that we are now finished with this foolishness.
I second that motion!
To a vote then.
Aye!
But, unfortunately, I'm fairly certain seconding your own motion is against the rules of proper procedure.
Duke
Posts: 9986 Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Post
by Duke » Nov 07, 2008 3:17 PM
Aye!
How about seconding and voting...
shagrath
Posts: 14980 Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Location: pLace
Post
by shagrath » Nov 07, 2008 3:19 PM
Duke wrote: Aye!
How about seconding and voting...
twin55
Posts: 2002 Joined: Jun 28, 2006
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Post
by twin55 » Nov 07, 2008 3:41 PM
Jeremy wrote: Or you could've said . . .
Duke wrote: Duke wrote: I move that we are now finished with this foolishness.
I second that motion!
To a vote then.
Aye!
But, unfortunately, I'm fairly certain seconding your own motion is against the rules of proper procedure.
Therefore, the foolishness will continue.....or
I
C.R. Krieger
Posts: 14507 Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Halfway up the left side of Lake Michigan
Contact:
Post
by C.R. Krieger » Nov 07, 2008 4:51 PM
I suppose you guys don't really want to discuss cloture at this juncture ...
Jeremy
Beamter
Posts: 15846 Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Connecticut
Post
by Jeremy » Nov 07, 2008 5:17 PM
Do we need a quorum present to invoke it by simple majority?
C.R. Krieger
Posts: 14507 Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Halfway up the left side of Lake Michigan
Contact:
Post
by C.R. Krieger » Nov 07, 2008 5:23 PM
Jeremy wrote: Do we need a quorum present to invoke it by simple majority?
Fuck me if I know ...
Where's my copy of
Roberts' Rules ?
Jeremy
Beamter
Posts: 15846 Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Connecticut
Post
by Jeremy » Nov 07, 2008 6:48 PM
We'd only need 2,215 members online to pull it off.
L_N_Love
Posts: 4106 Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Location: Richmond VA
Post
by L_N_Love » Nov 08, 2008 1:21 AM
Glad to see that the light has shined
Second!
Hunter has a Bimmer3
Posts: 1585 Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada/North Carolina
Post
by Hunter has a Bimmer3 » Nov 08, 2008 5:17 PM
L_N_Love wrote: Hunter has a Bimmer3 wrote: Well no one has said it so... BMWs wouldn't last five minutes in combat.
Or: "you wouldn't last 5 minutes in English class or reading comprehension."
Okay..... you got me there or their or they're. I don't know English all that good.
shagrath
Posts: 14980 Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Location: pLace
Post
by shagrath » Nov 10, 2008 9:19 AM
Hunter has a Bimmer3 wrote: L_N_Love wrote: Hunter has a Bimmer3 wrote: Well no one has said it so... BMWs wouldn't last five minutes in combat.
Or: "you wouldn't last 5 minutes in English class or reading comprehension."
Okay..... you got me there, their, or they're. I don't know English all that well.
Fixed!