Yeah I've been looking too and can't find many actual numbers. That Weaponx "white paper" I found (which by the way goes into some detail) does compare fine wire Iridiums to copper plugged, nickel/alloy center electrode plugs (2.5mm diameter).Jeremy wrote:The "reduced spark voltage requirement" thing you keep quoting is a bit of a red herring. While iridium plugs do take less voltage to fire, that's in comparison to platinum, not compared to standard copper plugs. I couldn't find any information regarding how much voltage iridium requires compared to copper or silver.
Based on their rough graphs it looks like ~18kV to ionize a nickel plug and maybe ~15.5kV to ionize the Iridium. They go on to explain though this has nothing to do with the actual material but owes its lower voltage to the smaller diameter electrode which they're able to get away with because of the hardness of the Iridium.
This is all I've found thus far:
http://www.weaponxperformance.com/techn ... ECH_V1.pdf
They also talk about ignitability for 2.5mm Ni/Chrome dropping off around 15:1 AFM vs fine wire Iridium which starts to drop off around 17:1...interesting to say the least.
I don't think that these are better plugs than the plugs designed for the system, but if this trend keeps going it might be a coincidental improvement for older ignition systems.


