External links now open in a new browser tab - turn this off in your UCP - Read more here.

who's good at math?

General conversations about BMW E28s and the people who own them.
shagrath
Posts: 14980
Joined: Jun 15, 2009 12:21 PM
Location: pLace

Post by shagrath »

That kind of basic algebra is taught in 7th grade pre-algebra and 8th grade algebra 1.
pleasefixitup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Nov 21, 2011 2:40 AM
Location: Chicagoland, Illinois

Post by pleasefixitup »

slammin_e28 wrote:Algebra is why I never went to college. It's bullshit. Need it for everything.

Now, Geometry, I used to be great at. All A's through high school. Hit Algebra and barely made it through....barely.
That makes me want to pick up a math book and try again. :oops:
There is a reason for that....most people are either good at one or the other...I'm great with geometry and not algebra. I hit algebra II and it was like I was learning Cantonese.

For some reason I had all the answers in class today, I think I'm remembering everything from high school.

I'm going to try to test out of the classes, then I'll be done with college months earlier than expected.
shagrath wrote:That kind of basic algebra is taught in 7th grade pre-algebra and 8th grade algebra 1.
It's actually algebra II from math 102.

It's not the lowest college math class, but it's pretty low.

Math 108 requires a 22 on the ACT and I got a 21 years back...Algebra is hard for me!
Matt
Posts: 2351
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Fargo

Re: who's good at math?

Post by Matt »

pleasefixitup wrote:t=29-1/4(w-k)

I have to solve for k.
There are two things two remember
1) you can do anything you want to, as long as you do it to both sides of the "=" sign.
2) but you can never divide by zero

re #1: some things are more advantageous than others, and it depends on how your brain is wired. Let's try this:

start: t=29-1/4(w-k)

let's add 1/4(w-k) to both sides:

t + 1/4(w-k) = 29

let's get rid of the dumb fraction, by multiplying everything by 4

4t + (w-k) = 4*29

let's get rid of the parantheses -- they are now redundant (also, we don't have to distribute a negation operation any longer)

4t + w - k = 4*29

lets add k to both sides (i don't like having minus signs anywhere)

4t + w = 4*29 + k

alright, now we can isolate k by subtracting 4*29 from both sides

4t + w - 4*29 = k

flip it around

k = 4t + w - 4*29

if you want to clean it up a touch, pull out the 4 as a factor

k = w + 4(t - 29)

or if you want to leave it expanded out

k = w + 4t - 116
TheLazyDog
Posts: 916
Joined: Oct 26, 2011 9:08 PM
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Contact:

Re: who's good at math?

Post by TheLazyDog »

Matt wrote:
pleasefixitup wrote:t=29-1/4(w-k)

I have to solve for k.
There are two things two remember
1) you can do anything you want to, as long as you do it to both sides of the "=" sign.
2) but you can never divide by zero

re #1: some things are more advantageous than others, and it depends on how your brain is wired. Let's try this:

start: t=29-1/4(w-k)

let's add 1/4(w-k) to both sides:

t + 1/4(w-k) = 29

let's get rid of the dumb fraction, by multiplying everything by 4

4t + (w-k) = 4*29

let's get rid of the parantheses -- they are now redundant (also, we don't have to distribute a negation operation any longer)

4t + w - k = 4*29

lets add k to both sides (i don't like having minus signs anywhere)

4t + w = 4*29 + k

alright, now we can isolate k by subtracting 4*29 from both sides

4t + w - 4*29 = k

flip it around

k = 4t + w - 4*29

if you want to clean it up a touch, pull out the 4 as a factor

k = w + 4(t - 29)

or if you want to leave it expanded out

k = w + 4t - 116
That is wrong. "1/4 (w-k)" is not (1/4) (w-k), which is what you used.
pleasefixitup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Nov 21, 2011 2:40 AM
Location: Chicagoland, Illinois

Re: who's good at math?

Post by pleasefixitup »

Matt wrote:
pleasefixitup wrote:t=29-1/4(w-k)

I have to solve for k.

if you want to clean it up a touch, pull out the 4 as a factor

k = w + 4(t - 29)
that was the correct answer actually.

the computer is really annoying as to how you enter it--even if it's the same in the end.

canis - the answer you posted earlier was very incorrect.

I'm not the best with algebra by any means, but I know enough to know that you were very wrong.
Frybrid 524td
Posts: 2689
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: ...

Re: who's good at math?

Post by Frybrid 524td »

pleasefixitup wrote:
Matt wrote:k = w + 4(t - 29)
that was the correct answer actually.

the computer is really annoying as to how you enter it--even if it's the same in the end.

canis - the answer you posted earlier was very incorrect.

I'm not the best with algebra by any means, but I know enough to know that you were very wrong.
How so?
Matt wrote:if you want to clean it up a touch, pull out the 4 as a factor

k = w + 4(t - 29)

or if you want to leave it expanded out

k = w + 4t - 116
CanisLupusRobotus wrote:k = 4t + w - 116
mooseheadm5
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 23035
Joined: Apr 08, 2009 10:30 PM
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Contact:

Re: who's good at math?

Post by mooseheadm5 »

pleasefixitup wrote: canis - the answer you posted earlier was very incorrect.

I'm not the best with algebra by any means, but I know enough to know that you were very wrong.
Well, you must not be the best with reading comprehension, because he was the first to post the correct answer. You should be saying "domo arigato Mr. Robotus".
pleasefixitup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Nov 21, 2011 2:40 AM
Location: Chicagoland, Illinois

Re: who's good at math?

Post by pleasefixitup »

mooseheadm5 wrote:
pleasefixitup wrote: canis - the answer you posted earlier was very incorrect.

I'm not the best with algebra by any means, but I know enough to know that you were very wrong.
Well, you must not be the best with reading comprehension, because he was the first to post the correct answer. You should be saying "domo arigato Mr. Robotus".
maybe I entered his answer and the one I posted stating it was the correct answer and his wasn't the correct answer.

came up as "incorrect"

Do I know why? No....I just know it was wrong.

Now, I have to do this crap on the computer....

So maybe both answers are correct, but the computer only recognized k = w + 4(t - 29) as correct.
mooseheadm5
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 23035
Joined: Apr 08, 2009 10:30 PM
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Contact:

Re: who's good at math?

Post by mooseheadm5 »

pleasefixitup wrote: So maybe both answers are correct, but the computer only recognized k = w + 4(t - 29) as correct.
His answer and that answer are equivalent. That one is technically the most simplified answer, though.
pleasefixitup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Nov 21, 2011 2:40 AM
Location: Chicagoland, Illinois

Re: who's good at math?

Post by pleasefixitup »

mooseheadm5 wrote:
pleasefixitup wrote: So maybe both answers are correct, but the computer only recognized k = w + 4(t - 29) as correct.
His answer and that answer are equivalent. That one is technically the most simplified answer, though.
They are, and I understand that.

Maybe you can understand my frustration with this internet homework...It's not the right answer that is always correct...it's the answer the computer wants that is correct.

I have missed many points due to entering a equivalent answer that the computer didn't like, not to mention the program being case sensitive...
mooseheadm5
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 23035
Joined: Apr 08, 2009 10:30 PM
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Contact:

Post by mooseheadm5 »

When in doubt, always go for the most simplified answer.
TheLazyDog
Posts: 916
Joined: Oct 26, 2011 9:08 PM
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Contact:

Re: who's good at math?

Post by TheLazyDog »

mooseheadm5 wrote:You should be saying "domo arigato Mr. Robotus".
:laugh:

pleasefixitup wrote:
Matt wrote:
pleasefixitup wrote:t=29-1/4(w-k)

I have to solve for k.

if you want to clean it up a touch, pull out the 4 as a factor

k = w + 4(t - 29)
that was the correct answer actually.

the computer is really annoying as to how you enter it--even if it's the same in the end.

canis - the answer you posted earlier was very incorrect.

I'm not the best with algebra by any means, but I know enough to know that you were very wrong.
By "that is wrong", I meant Matt did not solve with the correct order of operations. On your homework, or whatever, "1/4" is probably displayed as a one in the numerator and four in the denominator of a fraction bar. When you want to express "one-fourth" to us with charters on your keyboard you have to explicitly make it equal 0.25.

The expression you gave, in the form you gave it, is not what Matt and I found it to be in terms of k.



Being case sensitive is very important. V and v and different variables. As are M and m, etc.
mattur
Posts: 239
Joined: Nov 26, 2010 10:58 AM
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post by mattur »

Boy, glad I stayed out of this math lesson for awhile. Looks like you guys finally have it though. I understand the frustration with the order of the operations and working on a computer in type. I got the problem wrong myself and like to think I'm decent at math...
shagrath
Posts: 14980
Joined: Jun 15, 2009 12:21 PM
Location: pLace

Post by shagrath »

Nothing about this is algebra II. But what do I know I'm only studying to be a math teacher and my dad is an active math teacher.
Greg E34
Posts: 1818
Joined: Nov 24, 2008 1:18 AM
Location: The Dirty Dime

Post by Greg E34 »

tsmall07 wrote:
pleasefixitup wrote: I'm going to school for english...
:confused:

Now, or in the future?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Post Reply