sleepers? who likes what.

Show off your E28. Read epic threads of other's builds and projects.
davidu
Posts: 419
Joined: May 20, 2006

Post by davidu »

davidu wrote:i had a boosted e28 DD for a few years and was fun to shock people, Now it is N/A with 100hp of nitrous , all the stock driveabilty but with 100 extra wheel hp with the flip of a switch, zex kits are my prefernce
Image
grahamular
Posts: 1717
Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Post by grahamular »

This is my 'sleeper'. '93 VW EV. Only a sleeper because it's a 5-sp manual, so occasionally I can beat schools buses and box trucks off the line if I catch them at the right time. :)

-Graham
slammin_e28
Posts: 6140
Joined: Aug 05, 2007
Location: 24477

Post by slammin_e28 »

T_C_D wrote:m60b40 = 460lbs 286hp
ls1 = 435lbs 350hp
ls2 = 435lbs 400hp
ls7 = 435lbs 505hp

In addition the ls motors are much smaller dimensionally.
Yeah but they're still living in the heyday of pushrod technology.

DOHC or go home. :rofl:

I respect their output, etc, but I'm not a pushrod kinda guy. I love complex timing components that are prone to failure.
shagrath
Posts: 14980
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Location: pLace

Post by shagrath »

slammin_e28 wrote:
T_C_D wrote:m60b40 = 460lbs 286hp
ls1 = 435lbs 350hp
ls2 = 435lbs 400hp
ls7 = 435lbs 505hp

In addition the ls motors are much smaller dimensionally.
Yeah but they're still living in the heyday of pushrod technology.

DOHC or go home. :rofl:

I respect their output, etc, but I'm not a pushrod kinda guy. I love complex timing components that are prone to failure.
Hence why you LOVE M20's! :banana: ;)
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

slammin_e28 wrote:
T_C_D wrote:m60b40 = 460lbs 286hp
ls1 = 435lbs 350hp
ls2 = 435lbs 400hp
ls7 = 435lbs 505hp

In addition the ls motors are much smaller dimensionally.
Yeah but they're still living in the heyday of pushrod technology.

DOHC or go home. :rofl:

I respect their output, etc, but I'm not a pushrod kinda guy. I love complex timing components that are prone to failure.
That argument is no longer even a consideration. The most valid form of comparison of any engine involves 4 criteria.

weight
HP
efficiency
external dimensions

You could also add cost to maintain if that is a consideration.
B7Turbo
Posts: 1260
Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by B7Turbo »

KillerPM wrote:Ultimate sleeper?

THIS:

Image

With THIS under the hood:

Image

http://www.mye28.com/viewtopic.php?t=108450 (Very Picture Heavy).
Thx Pete, just to add that the experience of having almost 300 HP on the ground in a 2800 LB e28 is magical and priceless :alright: , actually we were to gather few times that we push the limit. :laugh: :laugh:
pleasefixitup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Nov 21, 2011
Location: Chicagoland, Illinois

Post by pleasefixitup »

T_C_D wrote:
slammin_e28 wrote:
T_C_D wrote:m60b40 = 460lbs 286hp
ls1 = 435lbs 350hp
ls2 = 435lbs 400hp
ls7 = 435lbs 505hp

In addition the ls motors are much smaller dimensionally.
Yeah but they're still living in the heyday of pushrod technology.

DOHC or go home. :rofl:

I respect their output, etc, but I'm not a pushrod kinda guy. I love complex timing components that are prone to failure.
That argument is no longer even a consideration. The most valid form of comparison of any engine involves 4 criteria.

weight
HP
efficiency
external dimensions

You could also add cost to maintain if that is a consideration.
For me, I rate engines in this way...

displacement to HP / Torque ratio (stock)

weight and efficiency and external dimensions are secondary calculations but displacement to HP is number 1.

From what I've learned, chevy motors aren't too great past 100K and bmw motors are just getting started at 100K...
Coldswede
Posts: 6859
Joined: Oct 10, 2008
Location: Back U.P. North,. Where the water's blue, the wind is free and seasons four.

Post by Coldswede »

chevy motors aren't too great past 100K and bmw motors are just getting started at 100K...
I dunno where you got that figure but Chevrolet engines go far longer than 100k. :facepalm:

Chevrolet engines are actually among the best in the world for power and durability. If the rest of a Chevrolet was as excellent as the engine the company would be in much, much better financial situation.

Ain't nuthin' wrong with push rod small block engine.
pleasefixitup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Nov 21, 2011
Location: Chicagoland, Illinois

Post by pleasefixitup »

Coldswede wrote:
chevy motors aren't too great past 100K and bmw motors are just getting started at 100K...
I dunno where you got that figure but Chevrolet engines go far longer than 100k. :facepalm:

Chevrolet engines are actually among the best in the world for power and durability. If the rest of a Chevrolet was as excellent as the engine the company would be in much, much better financial situation.

Ain't nuthin' wrong with push rod small block engine.
I love chevy motors, we have 3 SBC's in the garage, --one being in the 69 camaro.

I got that figure growing up with family that owned shops.
clongo
Posts: 1050
Joined: Nov 21, 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by clongo »

pleasefixitup wrote: From what I've learned, chevy motors aren't too great past 100K and bmw motors are just getting started at 100K...
BMW 6 cylinder motors are just getting started past 100k. BMW M62 and newer V8's are typically trashed due to neglect and cost a small fortune to rebuild past 100k. And the M62's suffer from that wonderful timing chain guide failure that tends to kill the motors past 100k.
slammin_e28
Posts: 6140
Joined: Aug 05, 2007
Location: 24477

Post by slammin_e28 »

BUT PUSHRODS.

My main thing is I like to keep to the make of car.

BMW engines go in BMWs

Chevy engines go in everything but BMWs. :rofl:

I'd love to slam a Rover V8 in an e30 to piss people off. Plus I have a BMW I6 in a Rover so it'd be funny.
LiftoffOversteer
Posts: 180
Joined: Nov 22, 2010
Location: 60527

Post by LiftoffOversteer »

dangerman
Posts: 34
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Location: NC

Post by dangerman »

pleasefixitup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Nov 21, 2011
Location: Chicagoland, Illinois

Post by pleasefixitup »

hahahaha I know that guy actually.

Real nice guy, doesn't really know what's going on with his car because he's a body man but he got it for a pretty good price already built.

That car is a MONSTER and if you want to talk about boost...holy shit!

He has a lot of camaros actually...
bhopp
Posts: 833
Joined: Dec 15, 2010
Location: Topeka, KS

Post by bhopp »

shagrath wrote:SR20DETT
Along the same lines, RB26DETT

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_RB_engine#RB26DETT

Image

Keeping with that straight 6 theme.

http://youtu.be/tt78wNz-2fk

http://www.drydenmotorsports.com/
dangerman
Posts: 34
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Location: NC

Post by dangerman »

pleasefixitup wrote:
hahahaha I know that guy actually.

Real nice guy, doesn't really know what's going on with his car because he's a body man but he got it for a pretty good price already built.

That car is a MONSTER and if you want to talk about boost...holy shit!

He has a lot of camaros actually...
I saw the build article in Hotrod. There was some inventive things done on that car.

Here's another of my favorites: http://www.thedodgegarage.com/the_reliant.html
Coldswede
Posts: 6859
Joined: Oct 10, 2008
Location: Back U.P. North,. Where the water's blue, the wind is free and seasons four.

Post by Coldswede »

My car is a Bronzit, therefore it is the ultimate sleeper. It is invisible. :cool:
pleasefixitup
Posts: 1856
Joined: Nov 21, 2011
Location: Chicagoland, Illinois

Post by pleasefixitup »

dangerman wrote:
pleasefixitup wrote:
hahahaha I know that guy actually.

Real nice guy, doesn't really know what's going on with his car because he's a body man but he got it for a pretty good price already built.

That car is a MONSTER and if you want to talk about boost...holy shit!

He has a lot of camaros actually...
I saw the build article in Hotrod. There was some inventive things done on that car.

Here's another of my favorites: http://www.thedodgegarage.com/the_reliant.html
With that car, there's stuff to be amazed by everywhere. You should see the trunk!

In person, well I just love that car. The owner is the nicest guy and the car is awesome because it looks pretty bad in person! Under the hood, and in the trunk...well all of that looks amazing. It was quite the $$ build...I think over 100K is in that car.
dangerman
Posts: 34
Joined: Sep 14, 2008
Location: NC

Post by dangerman »

I liked how they ran the intercooler piping through the dash.
Post Reply